Kuok Ker

Is me ChTan and I would like to talk about qualities of coach again. The basic of an quality coach or teacher's outline and equated as being the same for the 12Q because I am a teacher since January, 1989 and I was a teacher in primary school, in secondary and then serve in University now, yeh yeh yeh, how many years eh? Well... The timeless qualities in subject matter as a coach are : 1. Knowledge of the subject and intense interest and enthusiam about it. You know your staff, this is what we used to hear and think seriously, that is what is means ok!. 2. Willingness to share one's knowledge with anyone who is interested. What had happened here was when some one learn from one "Si fu" , later the some one is the person who would like to "kill" own "si fu " when conflict of interest there, right? This might be very negative connotation but happened ok. 3. Communication skills. While, this is common sense come in. Common sense gain from experiences

Well, eventually there are another 4Qs that needed to be consider the one's as an quality coach: 9. An ability to achieve educational objectives through the patient use of direct and indirect methods. 10. An excellent example in word, deed, and appearance. 11. An appreciation of artistic viewppoint as related to athletes. 12. A belife in and practice of human dignity as a basic quality of man? Man in the Q12 is actually refer to human being ok and there is no gender biases in this case. Hence, this example that make me recall and counter back on the question of : no matter how good is one policy or statement made by some one or whoever is, it is very crucial in depending on the person who read and how the person interpretation on the statement, right? As the result, if the statement been "purposive" misinterpreted then the coming up troubles or problems are even greater or serious but are these being bother by the interpretator ? No, I don't thing so. This situation

Qualities coaches that aspected or should own like: 5. Good judgement in the appropriate use of motivation techniques- having skills of encouragement, inspiration, and confidence. 6. A humanistic and ethical which emphasizes fairness, friendliness, and firmness. 7. An ability to innovate and to project within a sport setting and to envision any consequences to the total coaching environment. 8. Emotional stability and self-control in highly sensitive and involved situations associated with sports. Well, as far as involving athletes or player, Q6 needed to be seriously considere and pratice with ethically as a coach. My coaching experiences or coaching life before was I was with one group of year 3 students/players and followed my coaching plans and trained until they all reached sweet 18 girls. Results gained as : produced - 1 national level and 4 state level players in particular game and that' s why the Q6 played the "chemical reaction".

There seems to be a contemporary "myth" thats says coaches are very conservative, traditional, and rigid in their dealing with athletes, colleagues, and the community?! or Coaches are inflexible as believed of one is actually out dated but with common sense says that coaches are willing to shift strategies or technique as is like any scientist ? and adjustable to new style in behavior, this is what I am more concern with: Willingness in mind shift paradigm? or stayed in comfort zone with what eventually is? "athletic revolution" of late 60s and early 70s - did you hear about it before? yeh ? Qualities of a good coach? regarding to "The Coaches Manual" an old but accurate and reliable publication, recommends and following as desirable qualities of a coach. Let's see, read and appreciating them... Qualities: 1. Reasonable flexibility and receptivity to attitudinal changes in society, this is actually not easy to be fulfill by one' s individual or

"Coach" ia a title indicating respect, affection, status,and responsibility that can satay with one after actual caching days are over(Jones, B.J.; Wells, L.J; Teters, R.E & Johnson, D.J.1993) Once a coach, always "coach" to team members, colleagues, and the community. as far as atheletes are concerned, they will remember how their coaches did it and will form their own style of working by modelling after, or reacting to them and my question here, would be how true or how far this scenerio or believe and uphold over our side? What we always over heard here are "No lah, players alway forgot about us when they achieved succesful or glamourous award yeh? so, what is this means? More over, recently, as far as coaching is concerned, our National Sports Council (MSN) was started sports' coaches licencing, right? Which this is considered very good, positive and progressive move to impose the overall picture or status on who is the "Coach" and "

Hello friends, I am new in blogging and hope to joint you all for coming time. yeh yeh yeh